Is the adhesive or mechanical behavior of glass ceramics influenced by the adhesive layer application after etching and silanization? A literature review

Aim: This review investigated the effect of applying an adhesive after surface treatment of glass-ceramics on the bonding, mechanical or clinical behavior. Methods: Studies comparing the adhesive, mechanical or clinical behavior of glass-ceramics, with or without adhesive application after surface treatment, were included. Searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Sciences databases (January 2022), resulting in 15 included studies. Results: Regarding the evaluated outcomes, 13 studies assessed bond strength, 2 studies assessed biaxial flexural strength and 1 study assessed fatigue failure load, while no study evaluating clinical outcomes was included. It was possible to observe that the adhesive application after ceramic surface treatment was unfavorable or did not influence the evaluated outcomes. Conclusion: Most of the evidence available in the literature shows that the adhesive application after surface treatment does not improve the adhesive and mechanical behavior of glass-ceramics

Microtensile bond strength of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives to artificially created carious dentin.

This article evaluates a pH-cycling model for simulation of caries-affected and caries-infected dentin (CAD and CID, respectively) surfaces, by comparing the bond strength of an etch-and-rinse and a self-etch adhesive system. For both adhesives, bonding to sound dentin (SD) showed that the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) values of SD, CAD, and CID were SD > CAD > CID (P < 0.05). Knoop microhardness number mean values followed the same trend. Adhesive systems were not able to totally penetrate into CAD and CID, forming more irregular resin-dentin interdiffusion zones and atypical resin tags than SD. The tested in vitro pH-cycling caries model allowed the evaluation of specific dentin substrate alterations in response to µTBS. The type of dentin and its histological structure played an important role in etch-and-rinse and self-etch bonding, as lower µTBS values were attained in CAD and CID.

Influence of laboratory degradation methods and bonding application parameters on microTBS of self-etch adhesives to dentin.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the laboratory resistance to degradation and the use of different bonding treatments on resin-dentin bonds formed with three self-etching adhesive systems. METHODS: Flat, mid-coronal dentin surfaces from extracted human molars were bonded according to manufacturer's directions and submitted to two challenging regimens: (A) chemical degradation with 10% NaOC1 immersion for 5 hours; and (B) fatigue loading at 90 N using 50,000 cycles at 3.0 Hz. Additional dentin surfaces were bonded following four different bonding application protocols: (1) according to manufacturer's directions; (2) acid-etched with 36% phosphoric acid (H3PO4) for 15 seconds; (3) 10% sodium hypochlorite (NaOClaq) treated for 2 minutes, after H3PO4-etching; and (4) doubling the application time of the adhesives. Two one-step self-etch adhesives (an acetone-based: Futurabond/FUT and an ethanol-based: Futurabond NR/FNR) and a two-step self-etch primer system (Clearfil SE Bond/CSE) were examined. Specimens were sectioned into beams and tested for microtensile bond strength (microTBS). Selected debonded specimens were observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data (MPa) were analyzed by ANOVA and multiple comparisons tests (alpha= 0.05). RESULTS: microTBS significantly decreased after chemical and mechanical challenges (P< 0.05). CSE showed higher microTBS than the other adhesive systems, regardless the bonding protocol. FUT attained the highest microTBS after doubling the application time. H3PO4 and H3PO4 + NaOCl pretreatments significantly decreased bonding efficacy of the adhesives.

Influence of different surface conditioning protocols on microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: According to manufacturers, bonding with self-adhesive resin cements can be achieved without any pretreatment steps such as etching, priming, or bonding. However, the benefit of saving time with these simplified luting systems may be realized at the expense of compromising the bonding capacity. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess whether different dentin conditioning protocols influence the bond performance of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Flat dentin surfaces from 48 human molars were divided into 4 groups (n=12): 1) control, no conditioning; 2) H(3)PO(4), etching with 37% H(3)PO(4) for 15 seconds; 3) SEBond, bonding with self-etching primer adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond); and 4) EDTA, etching with 0.1M EDTA for 60 seconds. The specimens from each dentin pre-treatment were bonded using the self-adhesive cements RelyX Unicem, Maxcem or Multilink Sprint (n=4). The resin-cement-dentin specimens were stored in water at 37°C for 7 days, and serially sectioned to produce beam specimens of 1.0 mm(2) cross-sectional area. Microtensile bond strength (µTBS) testing was performed at 1.0 mm/min. Data (MPa) were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparisons test (α=.05). Fractured specimens were examined with a stereomicroscope (x40) and classified as adhesive, mixed, or cohesive. Additional bonded interfaces were evaluated under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). RESULTS: Cement-dentin µTBS was affected by the dentin conditioning approach (P<.001). RelyX Unicem attained statistically similar bond strengths to all pre-treated dentin surfaces. H(3)PO(4)-etching prior to the application of Maxcem resulted in bond strength values that were significantly higher than the other groups. The lowest µTBS were attained when luting Multilink Sprint per manufacturers' recommendations, while H(3)PO(4)-etching produced the highest values followed by Clearfil SE bonding and EDTA. SEM observations disclosed an enhanced potential of the self-adhesive cements to form a hybrid layer when applied following manufacturer's instructions. CONCLUSIONS: When evaluated self-adhesive resin cements are used, selectively etching dentin with H(3)PO(4) prior to luting results in the most effective bonding.

Effect of double layering and prolonged application time on MTBS of water/ethanol-based self-etch adhesives to dentin.

One way of possibly improving bond strength is by changing the application mode of self-etch adhesives. The current study evaluated the resin-dentin microtensile bond strength (MTBS) promoted by two- and one-step self-etching adhesives after different bonding application procedures. Flat dentin surfaces from extracted human molars were bonded: 1) according to the manufacturers' instructions, 2) duplicating the number of adhesive coats and 3) doubling the application time of the acidic primers. Two-step (Clearfil SE Bond/SEB and Resulcin AquaPrime/RE) and one-step (Etch & Prime 3.0/EP and One-Up Bond F/OUB) self-etch adhesives were used. Resin-dentin beams were tested in tension at 0.5 mm/minute. Selected debonded beams were observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). MTBS data were analyzed by ANOVA and multiple comparison tests (p < 0.05). The highest MTBS was always attained with SEB, regardless of the bonding procedure. RE, EP and OUB showed similar MTBS when bonded as per the manufacturers' instructions. The MTBS of OUB increased after doubling the application time and duplicating the adhesive coats. The two-step self-etch adhesives were insensible to changes in bonding application procedures. Attempts to improve the bonding performance of water/ethanol-based self-etching systems by using different bonding application parameters were system-specific and only effectively detected in one-step adhesive systems.

Effect of two axial wall height preparations on the retentive properties of full crowns using three different cements.

This study evaluated how different tooth preparation heights and luting cements affected the retention of metallic full crowns. Tooth preparations were made on 60 extracted maxillary premolars with occluso-cervical heights of 4.0 or 5.0 mm. The nickel chromium (NiCr) metallic crowns in each group were subdivided randomly into three groups (n = 10); the samples in each group were cemented with either a self-adhesive resin cement, a conventional resin cement, or a zinc phosphate cement. Cementation was performed by applying 5.0 kg pressure in 50% relative humidity. Specimens were stored in 100% humidity at 37 degrees C for seven days, at which time they were subjected to a vertical tensile test with a universal testing machine at 0.5 mm/min. Data (Kgf) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparisons tests (alpha = 0.01). There was a significant difference in mean force in the height preparations (P < 0.001) and in tensile strength (P < 0.001) among the resin cements. Regardless of the cement used, 5.0 mm high preparations showed significantly higher mean forces than the 4.0 mm high preparations. The self-adhesive resin cement showed significantly higher mean tensile strength than the conventional resin cement; the zinc phosphate cement displayed the lowest retention values. The self-adhesive resin cement displayed retention rates twice that of the zinc phosphate cement.

Resistance of ten contemporary adhesives to resin-dentine bond degradation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate resin-dentine bond degradation after 1 year of water storage. METHODS: Human dentine surfaces were bonded with two etch-and-rinse self-priming adhesives (Single Bond/SB and Prime & Bond NT/PBNT), three 2-step self-etching adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond/SEB, Resulcin Aqua Prime/RES and Non-Rinse Conditioner with Prime & Bond NT/NRC-PBNT), and five 1-step self-etching adhesives (Etch & Prime 3.0/EP, Prompt L-Pop/PLP, Solist/SOL, Futurabond/FUT and AQ Bond/AQ). Adhesives were applied according to manufacturers' instructions. Composite build-ups were constructed and the bonded teeth were stored (24 h, 6 months, 1 year) in distilled water at 37 degrees C. After storage, the intact teeth were sectioned into beams and all specimens were tested for microtensile bond strengths (MTBS). ANOVA and multiple comparisons tests were applied at alpha = 0.05. Fractographic analysis of debonded beams was performed using scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: SB, PBNT and SEB attained the highest MTBS, regardless of the storage period. A significant decrease in MTBS was observed after 6 months for SOL. After 12 months the only groups that did not reduce bond strength were SB and SEB. Bonded specimens in NRC-PBNT, RES and FUT produced pre-testing failures after 12 months, and MTBS could not be measured. CONCLUSIONS: The resistance of resin-dentine bonds to degradation is material-dependent. When the enamel-resin interface is preserved, the etch-and-rinse adhesives and the mild 2-step self-etch adhesive SEB exhibited the best resin-dentine bond durability. Those tested self-etching adhesives having a pH < or 1 and using water or acetone as solvent attained catastrophic bond failure after 1 year of water storage.

Resistance to degradation of resin-dentin bonds using a one-step HEMA-free adhesive.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the resistance to degradation of resin-dentin bonds formed with a one-step acetone-containing and HEMA-free adhesive. METHODS: Flat, mid-coronal dentin surfaces were bonded with G Bond under dry and wet conditions. The bonded teeth were subjected to fatigue loading (90 or 250 N) using 5000 or 50000 cycles (at 3.0 Hz) and to chemical degradation (10% NaOCl immersion for 5 h). Specimens were sectioned into beams and tested for microtensile bond strength. Fractographic analysis was performed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Additional specimens were processed for morphological examination of the interfaces. RESULTS: Bond strength significantly decreased after the chemical challenge (p<0.05), but not after load cycling. Dentinal moisture did not affect bond strength. Most of the recorded failures were adhesive and located at the top of the hybrid layer. A poorly infiltrated hybrid layer with bubbles entrapped within the adhesive was observed in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: A discrepancy between water/solvent evaporation rate and convective and evaporative water fluxes from the underlying dentin may be responsible of the droplet formation within the adhesive layer, thus reducing bond strength. A "stress relieving" effect may occur during loading. A loss of bonding effectiveness is expected overtime, mainly due to chemical degradation of the hybrid layer.

Influence of ceramic surface conditioning and resin cements on microtensile bond strength to a glass ceramic.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: It is not clear how different glass ceramic surface pretreatments influence the bonding capacity of various luting agents to these surfaces. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (microTBS) of 3 resin cements to a lithia disilicate-based ceramic submitted to 2 surface conditioning treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen 5 x 6 x 8-mm ceramic (IPS Empress 2) blocks were fabricated according to manufacturer's instructions and duplicated in composite resin (Tetric Ceram). Ceramic blocks were polished and divided into 2 groups (n=9/treatment): no conditioning (no-conditioning/control), or 5% hydrofluoric acid etching for 20 seconds and silanization for 1 minute (HF + SIL). Ceramic blocks were cemented to the composite resin blocks with 1 self-adhesive universal resin cement (RelyX Unicem) or 1 of 2 resin-based luting agents (Multilink or Panavia F), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The composite resin-ceramic blocks were stored in humidity at 37 degrees C for 7 days and serially sectioned to produce 25 beam specimens per group with a 1.0-mm(2) cross-sectional area. Specimens were thermal cycled (5000 cycles, 5 degrees C-55 degrees C) and tested in tension at 1 mm/min. Microtensile bond strength data (MPa) were analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparisons tests (alpha=.05). Fractured specimens were examined with a stereomicroscope (x40) and classified as adhesive, mixed, or cohesive. RESULTS: The surface conditioning factor was significant (HF+SIL > no-conditioning) (P<.0001). Considering the unconditioned groups, the microTBS of RelyX Unicem was significantly higher (9.6 +/- 1.9) than that of Multilink (6.2 +/- 1.2) and Panavia F (7.4 +/- 1.9). Previous etching and silanization yielded statistically higher microTBS values for RelyX Unicem (18.8 +/- 3.5) and Multilink (17.4 +/- 3.0) when compared to Panavia F (15.7 +/- 3.8). Spontaneous debonding after thermal cycling was detected when luting agents were applied to untreated ceramic surfaces. CONCLUSION: Etching and silanization treatments appear to be crucial for resin bonding to a lithia disilicate-based ceramic, regardless of the resin cement used.